<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Lexoral — Blog</title>
    <link>https://lexoral.org/blog/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://lexoral.org/blog/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <description>Legal transcription in Canada and the United States: guides, and a regular watch on transcription and justice.</description>
    <language>en-ca</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 13:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Record watch: transcription and justice in Canada and the U.S. — late September 2026</title>
      <link>https://lexoral.org/blog/watch-2026-09-30/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://lexoral.org/blog/watch-2026-09-30/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>Watch</category>
      <description>An AI-assisted transcript before the Texas Supreme Court, a new California court-reporting law, and an Acadian courthouse at the Supreme Court of Canada.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What a legal transcript is for — and who actually reads it</title>
      <link>https://lexoral.org/blog/what-a-legal-transcript-is-for/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://lexoral.org/blog/what-a-legal-transcript-is-for/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>Guide</category>
      <description>A transcript is not a set of notes: it is the record. Who reads it (appeal courts, counsel, judges, witnesses), how it is cited, and why accuracy matters.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Court reporter, transcriptionist, interpreter: who does what</title>
      <link>https://lexoral.org/blog/court-reporter-transcriptionist-interpreter/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://lexoral.org/blog/court-reporter-transcriptionist-interpreter/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>Guide</category>
      <description>Three jobs that get confused. In Quebec, Ontario and the U.S.: who takes the record, who transcribes it, who interprets, and what each one produces.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deposing a Canadian witness for a U.S. case</title>
      <link>https://lexoral.org/blog/deposing-a-canadian-witness-for-a-us-case/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://lexoral.org/blog/deposing-a-canadian-witness-for-a-us-case/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>Cross-border</category>
      <description>Canada is not a party to the Hague Evidence Convention. Willing witnesses, letters rogatory, and what to plan for when the witness speaks French.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Record watch: transcription and justice in Canada and the U.S. — September 2026</title>
      <link>https://lexoral.org/blog/watch-2026-09/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://lexoral.org/blog/watch-2026-09/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category>Watch</category>
      <description>California allows recording when no court reporter is available, North Dakota moves to audio, AI next, and language is back before Quebec’s Superior Court.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
