The rest of the file.

Six pages carrying the detail the home page only states. Each was written for a question someone actually arrived with.

Exh. ALegal transcription in QuebecSection 133 makes both languages the record, and nobody interprets.Examinations on discovery · out-of-court examinations · commercial and labour arbitration · Tribunal administratif du travail · Tribunal administratif du Québec · discipline committees · coroner’s inquests · per-language stenographer accreditation · where we workRead →Exh. BFrench recordings as evidenceThe recording is the evidence; the transcript is there to assist it.Lawful intercepts · body-worn and in-car camera audio · 911 and emergency-services calls · custodial interviews · jail telephone calls · covert and consent recordings · voicemail · source-language transcription first, translation aligned to itRead →Exh. CWhat paragraph 530.1(g) requiresThree transcripts, not one, and everyone in the room has to be bilingual.Criminal Code s. 530 and s. 530.1(g) · R. v. Munkonda · Constitution Act, 1867 s. 133 · Official Languages Act s. 14 · Courts of Justice Act (Ontario) s. 126(1)Read →Exh. DServices and specificationFour kinds of proceeding, four sets of conventions.Depositions and examinations · arbitration and mediation · tribunal hearings · recorded evidence · the full datasheet of what is included and what can be asked for · specimen transcriptRead →Exh. ECross-border, Canada and the United StatesOne sitting, two sets of conventions, one record.A Canadian witness examined for a U.S. matter · a U.S. party filing in Quebec · parallel proceedings · cross-border arbitration · letters rogatory and depositions of willing witnessesRead →Exh. FTwenty-one questions, answeredWhose words enter the record, what we attest, turnaround, pricing, confidentiality.Grouped in five parts. The first six decide whether we are useful to you at all.Read →

A recording or a proceeding in French, English or both? Send us the proceeding, the languages and the deadline.

Submit a proceeding →